Posted by chet on January 25, 2005 at 12:53:13:
you need to look into the other terms of the lease It would seem that the bank or new benificary would effectively become the landlord.
Posted by chet on January 25, 2005 at 12:53:13:
you need to look into the other terms of the lease It would seem that the bank or new benificary would effectively become the landlord.
Subordination - Posted by John
Posted by John on January 24, 2005 at 13:40:46:
Hello, I have a “boiler plate” clause in a lease that I have had signed by tenants in 2002. It states:
“lease shall be subordinate to all present or future mortgages”
What exactly does that clause mean - and especially it’s relavence to the property being foreclosed (in 2005) by the mortage holder - date of note and trust deed is 2000. Thanks for any help offered.
Re: Subordination - Posted by chet
Posted by chet on January 24, 2005 at 20:26:55:
I would intreprete that to mean the lease is a junior obligation to the mortgage.
So if the mortgage has an assignment of rents clause, there’s a subordinate lease whos rents can be grabbed.
Re: Subordination - Posted by John
Posted by John on January 25, 2005 at 12:08:35:
Thanks for the reply. Would the tenants have a right to sue me, the landlord, if the property was taken back by the mortgage holder and the tenants was asked to leave before the expiration of the lease?