Subject2 Course - Posted by Brandon

Posted by chris-atl on November 13, 2003 at 09:30:50:

I wouldn’t listen to the street. Those people who are saying it blows haven’t been successful with it because they don’t want to try. I have no problem telling you that the course is great and the sales presentation is priceless and the whole system is great. It will get you through so many typical seller objections that would normally hang most people up. Plus, you get access to his sub-2 forum to bounce ideas off other people and get assistance quickly. AND the most valuable thing you get with his course that I would venture to say doesn’t come with any other course - $Cash’s$ cell phone number for whenever you need him.

Hope this helps. Trust me, just buy the course if you really want to see the sales presentation. It will make you money.

Subject2 Course - Posted by Brandon

Posted by Brandon on November 11, 2003 at 12:39:10:

Has anyone purchased the “How to Find, Close, and Sell Properties Using the Existing Financing” course by Peter Conti and David Finkel? If so, was it helpful…$695 helpful?

I am intrigued by this method of purchasing RE and would like to learn more.

Re: Subject2 Course (more specifically…) - Posted by Brandon

Posted by Brandon on November 11, 2003 at 12:47:03:

How does this course compare to ‘Profits While We Sleep Home Study Course’ by RealBooks, LLC or The ?Ultimate? SUB2 Guidebook by William Tingle?

Are there any other good books, courses, audio materials that cover the subject?

Thanks!

Re: Subject2 Course (more specifically…) - Posted by Jim FL

Posted by Jim FL on November 11, 2003 at 20:13:06:

Brandon,
I heard the best sub2 course has yet to be released…but will be soon.:slight_smile:

I would agree that anything produced by Tingle is good.
Price seems right, and he has a good handle on buying sub2 etc.

Ca$h is EXCELLENT, and you know what, I’ll let you in on a little clue here.
NOT ONE SINGLE COURSE has forms that should be used “out of the box”. So, for those who say this course is “not as good” due to missing forms…well, they’re wrong.
Ca$h offers good feedback and input, seems fairly straight forward, and honestly, I think he is just plain “good people”.
I will be lucky enough to meet the man himself in a couple weeks here, and look forward to it.

As for the other course, the ABC’s or what ever, sure, some swear by it, as they learned using it.
Personally, my opinion… the folks who add hype to sell things, and seem to encourage folks to buy with very little equity…well, it is dangerous and irresponsible.(That ought to get the post deleted, oops!)

Anyway, read all you can FREE, check out the various places to study and discuss the method of buying this way, then look in a week or so for what courses are out there.

I have a feeling there will be something straight forward with no hype or fluff, and perhaps REALITY all throughout the thing.

Then again, who knows?

If you must make a choice now, stick within your budget, and save til you can get em all.
EVERY course, has something to offer, if the writers are actual investors.

Just my two cents,
Jim FL

Re: Subject2 Course (more specifically…) - Posted by gerald(tx)

Posted by gerald(tx) on November 11, 2003 at 19:25:53:

The four I have are by: Legrand, France, $Cash, and Tingle.

Legrand and France are great but pricey. They are both primarily in the seminar business and throw a little dreamland stuff out to spice things up and sell more.

Cash’s course is lacking on details, he doesn’t use a trust, and his forms aren’t applicable in most states. But he is cheap and is great about responding to your questions.

Tingle’s is the most realistic and matches what I do in real life. Good forms. No dreamland stuff and very comprehensive. Only $227 makes it the best buy in my opinion. Plus he answers all on his website.

My views, I’m sure others will differ.

GP

Re: Subject2 Course (more specifically…) - Posted by chris-atl

Posted by chris-atl on November 11, 2003 at 18:37:00:

“Subject-to: That’s what I do” by John $Cash$ Locke is hands down the best subject-to course on the market and it’s only $150.

Re: Subject2 Course (more specifically…) - Posted by Hank FL

Posted by Hank FL on November 12, 2003 at 21:17:05:

LeGrand has a sub2 course ?

Tell me about the CA$H course please.

I don’t care that he doesn’t use land trusts, or that the forms are this or that.

I’m interested in his sales pitch.

Could you tell me as much as you can about his “script”, or “straight line” ?

Re: Subject2 Course (more specifically…) - Posted by RZ-Indy

Posted by RZ-Indy on November 12, 2003 at 24:04:04:

I have to disagree with the comment on the France’s. I am fortunate enough to live where I can attend the REI meetings that Charlie and Randy lead. They are not “primarily in the seminar business”. They are primarily real estate investors, real down to earth people, who have been kind enough to share their knowledge in their course.

The ABC’s of Subject To course by the France’s is very detailed, nuts and bolts, assumes you know nothing about the business. It’s very comprehensive and easy to understand.

I have Ron LeGrand’s material and found it lacking in details that I as a newbie need. Ron’s a self-described “Reptile Brain” and it seems his material is geared towards the same.

I don’t have Tingle’s course, but I’m impressed with his availability on his website. He seems to know what he’s talking about.

I have read good reviews of Cash’s course, and you can’t beat his price.

Re: Subject2 Course (more specifically…) - Posted by Hank FL

Posted by Hank FL on November 12, 2003 at 21:25:23:

I’m interested in CA$H’s sales presentation.

Could you tell me about it with some detail ?

Re: Subject2 Course (more specifically…) - Posted by gerald(tx)

Posted by gerald(tx) on November 13, 2003 at 01:40:27:

Well, if all you are looking for is the sales pitch, I would have to say Cash’s course is by far the best in this area. In fact, 3/4 of his course is what to say once you get inside the door. It is particularly good for a person who doesn’t have any sales experience or might be reluctant or hesitant approaching sellers.

Personally, I never use a script. But as we all come from different backgrounds and experiences, I’m sure this slants my views on the merits of the courses.

Having said that, let me say that I use a mixture of ideas from all four courses, and these courses have all paid for themselves many times over in my Sub2 deals.

Re: Subject2 Course (more specifically…) - Posted by chris-atl

Posted by chris-atl on November 13, 2003 at 05:26:23:

I would be doing him a disservice if I explained it in detail. That’s why he sells his course. It’s only $150 and well worth it.

Wof ! wof! bark! bark! - Posted by Hank FL

Posted by Hank FL on November 13, 2003 at 09:22:29:

Give me a couple of his best, snappy “one liner” rebuttals will ya ?

I need something to go on here.

Throw this dog a bone. :–P

Huh ? - Posted by Hank FL

Posted by Hank FL on November 13, 2003 at 09:15:28:

Sooooooooooooo … that means that all those reviews at Amazon.com and the NY Times book review are doing a disservice to the authors?

Word on the street is that the course blows.

I’m asking you to tell me about the course’s strong suit - selling the sub2.

That’s what he should re-name it as a matter of fact.

If it’s a “sales” course and not a “technique” course, then there wouldn’t be as much concern about the forms and the “what, no trusts?” thing.

Giving advice on a course I haven’t read – that’s new.