Posted by JHyre in TexOhio on May 22, 2001 at 07:26:30:
Related parties are not a big issue with real estate partnerships, at least not under the facts that you’ve described. The problem will be certain provisions of partnership capital accounting, partnership anti-abuse regulations and business purpose. One thing that could work for your brother- 704(c) allocations using the curative or remedial methods (just trust me on the jargon!). Say you contribute a property with low basis and high value and your relative(s) contribute cash. Let’s say the basis of the property (ignoring land for simplicity’s sake) is $10,000 and the FMV is $40,000. Therefore, the property has $30,000 of “built-in gain”. To make a long story short, each of your relatives could be allocated $10,000 of extra depreciation or other favorable tax items over time…BUT at your expense- you would effectively receive $20,000 of extra “phantom” gain over the same period. Assuming that you are in a lower bracket than they are and that other tax principles do not interfere, they can get high NPV of benefits. The problem: Few tax people truly and thoroughly understand these rules…though their complexity accounts for a VERY low audit rate on these issues as well. In fact, I’ve never seen someone get audited on these issues. REITs deal with these Code provisions daily.
John Hyre