Re: Mobile Home Park valuation - Posted by Tony Colella
Posted by Tony Colella on March 22, 2011 at 08:15:14:
Actually that is not my method Dr.B but more a combination of methods.
My method was to approach the income (all the income). Do not use a CAP rate or Gross Rent Multiplier or other formula. Just a checkbook/income analysis but include the “pay yourself first” amount based upon the condition of the trailers and the work needed to keep them maintained.
Years ago I sat with Ernest Tew who’s method of using a CAP rate on the lot rent and then adding in a lonnie deal price on the home. The problem I suggested that was if you could not get the seller down this low you might need to factor in the cost of not just a Lonnie deal but rather the cost a home of that condition purchased as a repo, moved and set up etc. Now if the home was one you would pull out then the reverse would be true as it is an expense you will face.
Ernest agreed that the Lonnie deal price might not work. So instead of say $2k he might choose $8k which was more in the middle. You still want to buy LOW but you still need to buy.
Several years ago Ray Alcorn suggested that the park owned rental homes Never have any value. I felt this was incorrect because without the home he would not receive the lot rent.
The caution needed is to not combine different strategies. My strategy is simply looking at what you can reasonably expect to receive in income, what your expenses are, pay yourself before you pay the mortgage and the use what is left over as the amount that propety can pay on a mortgage and not a dime more. You can start low and negotiate up to this point or negotiate the mortgage terms.
Ray and Ernest were players on a much larger scale and to them a park owned home was a liability. For the smaller park player and those new to park ownership we are more likely than not to have to own at least some, if not all, the homes in the park.
Again there is no right or wrong, just whatever works for you.
I prefer the checkbook analysis because any error made is not compounded so much that it can sink you. I have seen folks analyze large parks and miss an expense which overstates the income which is the magnified through the valuation formula making the park appear that it makes far more money than it does and thus the buyer paying more than the park will support. Again, no right or wrong just what works.
Tony