Re: My take… - Posted by Vic
Posted by Vic on August 02, 2001 at 24:51:46:
Tim,
In your post you wrote:
It’s been my experience that I only see what I’m looking for, so to speak. Let’s see, the only motivated sellers in LA are 2 payments behind? Not! I think Hal’s doing okay on a cash and cashflow basis, wouldn’t you say?
Let me clarify this because I don’t want anyone to think that I’m of the mindset that this won’t work where I live. When I say that the seller’s who are less than 2 mos behind are not motivated, what I mean is that they’re not motivated to sell the way that I want to buy. If they’re current on the pmts., I can almost assure you that a L/O or a land contract will not be considered. Now there are some exceptions to that - the primary one being, if they have absolutely no equity in property, then they would be open to L/O or CFD and coupled with this, usually they’ve already got another place they want to go to. Since that is not the boat that most sellers are in, it makes doing the creative deal very difficult without putting up any cash at all.
Now, don’t get me wrong, if I’ve got a seller who is current on pmts., but maybe has 7K in equity, I probably could do either L/O or CFD simply by giving him enough money to move - perhaps a couple thousand or so - that’s also assuming he’s ready to get out real soon. If he hasn’t found another place yet, then this may not even work.
So I’m not saying that this stuff doesn’t work, what I’m saying is to get in for absolutely no money down & have them L/O or CFD their house to you is very, very difficult, unless there’s sufficient motivation. Being behind in pmts provides that motivation. Usually the sellers who would accept a creative type of arrangement usually need at least some money to move. Plus since I like to buy on CFD, I will always have some closing costs. Of course the sellers aren’t getting enough cash out of deal to pay all of closing costs. Many times I’m paying all closing costs. To close these deals costs me anywhere from 900-1200.
Let me give you an example of 2 deals I recently done.
#1. Very, very typical scenario here. People were behind 3 mos. in pmts, thus there was motivation. NOt a problem to do this deal or to get them to sell to me on CFD. BUT, to do it, I had to put up some cash - namely 3 pmts plus r.e.commission (since listing agent was the one who turned me on to deal) plus closing came to about $4800. I’ll maybe get 4K down when I sell, possibly 5K, but probably not much more since it’s only a 80K house. This kind of scenario is so typical here I could probably do 10 a month if I could find the sellers in time.
Deal #2. People were current in pmts. Hated their neighborhood though, therefore motivated. However they needed cash to buy another house. Originally wanted about 2500. I managed to get them down to 800, BUT there was still the same r.e.agent & commission & closing, so total cash upfront about 3900.
Same price range as other house, so my down pmt will be about the same.
The above 2 situations are very common. Now there are those sellers who would sell without me putting up any cash, but the great majority of those are in situations where buying their house is just not a good decision. They may have a sky high int. rate or they may have equity in the property & want it all in cash or whatever. They’re just not good deals.
Let me give you another example. I got a call from a guy who owns 2 duplexes in an area that would put a smile on HR’s face & get his heart racing. The guy bought them 15 yrs ago. One needs lots of work. The other needs some work. Has a blanket mtg. on both. He borrowed 55k on them 15 yrs ago. He would be happy to get 6 or 7K cash (probably a lot less if I made him a solid offer) & have someone take over the note. Sounds good so far right? Take over pmts, collect rent & pay him a lil cash. Problem is his int. rate is 11.25. His P&I pmt alone is 535/mo & he’s only collecting 930/mo total from all 4 units in rent. By the time you add ins., repairs, etc, it’s no longer that good of a deal.
These are the types of deals I get calls on constantly. So, do you see why I say that sellers who are current are less willing to do creative deals. They just haven’t come to the realizion yet that they’re not gonna get the cash that they think they will. A seller 2 mos. behind is starting to realize that though.
Another example - had guy call me with house - current on pmts. Has equity in it. Wanted it all up front, or at least 10K of it, so that he could buy another house. Get calls like this constantly where if I could give them their equity, they would sell to me on CFD with no problem. Problem with this, of course, is you would need an unlimited amount of cash.
Ok, I think you see my point by now, so I won’t go on any further.
As for Hal, he’s working in a totally different arena than I am. He’s buying inner city houses in need of tons of repairs, rehabbing them & either selling them or renting them out. I’m working more with the pretty houses.
It’s a good bit easier to get a seller to cooperate when the house has been sitting vacant for 5 yrs., half the roof is missing, the neighbors are using it as target practice (sorry Hal, couldn’t resist) :), & the whole back of the house is sinking and they just got notice from the city that the house is being condemned. You can get things done with this type of seller, if you can find them, a whole lot easier than you can with a seller in a nice house, & who is current on pmts.
I respect HR for taking on these types of deals as they will put many gray hairs on your head quick. He absolutely deserves all the cash he gets out of them, probably more.
I do see the importance of a contingency fund & I’m glad you responded the way you did. I have to admit though, up until now, I really haven’t been all that worried about it. But, I can tell you, that’s a changing - quick too! I definitely don’t wanna get caught with not enough cash on hand.
Anyway, that’s the beauty of this board - when you need a solution, it’s usually close by.
Thanks Tim & as always I appreciate your posts & always hope to gain something from them.
Vic