Re: John T. Reed - Posted by Sean
Posted by Sean on November 20, 2002 at 18:11:12:
What?s wrong with John T. Reed ? one person?s personal opinion
John Reed is a Realtor who?s invested a little and has a convoluted sense of ethics that he tries to cram down everyone else?s throat. I could quote extensively from his rant against ?Nothing Down? deals but rather I?ll just sum up his objections in a word ? suitability. His contention is that you are marketing a security to an unsophisticated person that is unsuitable to them. Horrors ? you might have the SEC pull your securities license or have the NASD sanction you ? oh wait, you don?t have a securities license, nor are you a member of the NASD. Guess that won?t happen, will it?
Amazingly while it is UNCONSCIONABLE to offer a seller 100% value plus interest over a period of time it is perfectly and wonderfully acceptable to know that a house is worth $100,000 and try to buy it for $80,000 or less. In fact, he has two volumes of books entitled ?How to Buy Real Estate for At Least 20% below Market Value? volume 1 and 2. Obviously the first case is pure theft and the second case is perfectly normal, moral, legal and ethical. Also, he obviously thinks I am an idiot.
He rails on further about how bad ?Nothing Down? is, but mentions that he has the legitimate way to do nothing down deals. How? Through the magic of government grants/government guarantees. Get this ? Uncle Sam sends the IRS to your door to take money from you by force (and if you think it isn?t done by force, try not paying for a few years and see what happens) and then John Reed and/or his disciples get a hold of the money and make fabulous wealth. What?s the difference between that and me showing up at your front door with a gun, taking your money and giving it to my sister as a down payment on a house? Nothing, except that because a government did it it?s quasi-legal.
Back to the suitability issue. I seem to recall it wasn?t that long ago when investors were pushing ?widows and orphans? to buy utility stocks. Government regulated and guaranteed to have a ?fair? return on money it seemed like a great, safe way to make money, didn?t it? Well, I live in California and out here people who owned SoCal Edison lost their shirts on those stocks. Obviously there is risk in EVERYTHING and the solution is not to try to protect ?unsophisticated investors? from every bump in the road but instead teach them how to add some sophistication to their efforts.
John Reed states, ?I believe seminars that cost more than $100 per hour per attendee are grossly overpriced.? Yet I can refer you to a fantastic person by the name of Jay Abraham who charges $15,000 per seminar and $5,000 per hour to consult. Why in the world would anyone pay $15,000 for a seminar, you might wonder? Well, two reasons: (1) His information is worth it; and, (2) You can listen to half of the three day seminar and if you don?t like what you?re getting you can leave and owe nothing.
I don?t see why John Reed seems to think that he is the final word on how the free market system is and should work but apparently he considers himself one of the Anointed that is entitled to set prices for other people. He also mentioned that he believes in the death penalty for people who don?t put indexes in their work.
I remember reading a line of John Reed?s where he quotes someone (I can?t find it right now) but the essence of it is that you should buy stock that will go up and if it isn?t going to go up, don?t buy it. He goes on to say that no one can tell when stock or real estate is going to go up and it?s all a risk.
No one can tell? Or he can?t tell market trends and chooses to insist that no one can tell? I could refer you to an excellent guy right now who?s got a real estate vital signs indicator product that tells you which way real estate is going to go in the next year. I can refer you to excellent articles on real estate economics by a Nobel prize-winning economist on what causes booms and busts in cycles. Maybe John Reed doesn?t have this information, but he shouldn?t insist that NO ONE has it.
Sorry, Ron ? if you want to buy his courses then more power to you, but I won?t be spending my money on his advice.