Posted by Diane (TX) on March 31, 2003 at 07:16:16:
CA makes it own rules, and they’re generally in CA’s favor
Posted by Diane (TX) on March 31, 2003 at 07:16:16:
CA makes it own rules, and they’re generally in CA’s favor
interstate income taxes - Posted by James Buster
Posted by James Buster on March 29, 2003 at 04:43:40:
I’m trying to firm up my understanding of interstate income taxes. Here’s how I understand it to work. Please correct me if I’m wrong:
I’m a resident of state A. I have a rental property in state Z.
Re: interstate income taxes - Posted by Diane (TX)
Posted by Diane (TX) on March 29, 2003 at 12:24:12:
Generally correct, but the mechanics may vary.
Often, you will get a pro-rated exemption. If Z income is 2% of your total federal income, you might get 2% of Z’s exemption amount. Or you could get no exemption.
Depends on the state. Often Z state rental income is taxable only by Z, but it may be taxable in A and you take a state tax credit for double taxed income.
This also would depend on the state.
CA is claiming tax on out of state income (NT) - Posted by David Krulac
Posted by David Krulac on March 30, 2003 at 08:06:09:
`
Re: CA is claiming tax on out of state income (NT) - Posted by James Buster
Posted by James Buster on April 01, 2003 at 16:41:03:
I find it odd that CA cannot apply sales tax to CA residents buying out-of-state goods, but can apply income tax to income earned out-of-state, even given the absurd Supreme Court interpretations of recent decades. Now I have to figure out CA’s arcane rules for partial year residents.