Re: How big is too big? - Posted by Tony Colella
Posted by Tony Colella on February 10, 2005 at 15:53:27:
John, I might understand your argument if it were referring to singlewides in parks but if we take the question and address it to land/home deals, the answer might be quite different.
The singlewides provide little to no net worth growth, or access to cash through financing. That was why we called them “cash flow critters.” The singlewide land/home deal is a creature of another kind. It is inexpensive and spits off cash flow but that’s about all it can do.
With the doublewide land/home deals, you can buy wholesale and have access to the equity through financing.
By utilizing the doublewide land/home as a “land bank” as we do, you can pull thousands of tax free dollars out of the property. The property still cash flows but now you are able to use that cash to do other deals.
You could pay cash for a singlewide land/home deal, leverage the money into more doublewide land/home deals, small parks etc.
The doublewide land/home deal provides us with all 3 legs of the balanced financial stool. Cash flow, access to lumps sums of cash and net worth growth.
As for Leon’s concern about what is too big, there is a point at which a larger doublewide on land becomes too big, but there are arguments for and against.
As a landlord, I prefer the middle sized doublewides as rentals. Less cost to operate and you don’t really lose too much in income. Dollar for dollar they are better producers than the 2100 + square foot homes (here in my area).
But the larger home may be a terrific land/bank. Having one that size might allow an investor the opportunity to pull a great deal of cash to do several other deals that make a great deal of higher cash flow return.
There are many ways of looking at deals. There are no right or wrong answers. It just depends upon what works well enough for you. I just wanted to point another option.
Tony