Posted by Sailor on July 28, 2006 at 07:40:30:
I tried to respond off-list, but the e-mail was undeliverable.
Tye
coop’s responsibility - Posted by joyce
Posted by joyce on July 27, 2006 at 18:59:36:
If a shareholder pushes another tenant on the elevator
isn’t this a coop matter?
My boyfriend was pushed in the elevator by a shareholder and the managing agent informed me in writing that
this is a personal issue not a coop matter.
How could CoOp have prevented? - Posted by John Merchant
Posted by John Merchant on July 28, 2006 at 11:11:11:
Wow…so CoOp should be responsible for whatever any fool on their property does playfully or maliciously, on his own, that the CoOp could neither predict or control?
Again, just wow.
Re: coop’s responsibility - Posted by Sailor
Posted by Sailor on July 27, 2006 at 22:41:48:
If there was an assault I would think a police report would be the
1st order of business.
Tye
Re: How could CoOp have prevented? - Posted by joyce
Posted by joyce on July 28, 2006 at 19:26:50:
I think you’re missing the point.
The coop should be responsible and send that shareholder a warning letter so it doesn’t happen again on the building’s property.
Re: coop’s responsibility - Posted by joyce
Posted by joyce on July 28, 2006 at 06:35:57:
This happened in the coop.
If somebody punches somebody else isn’t the coop responsible if somebody gets hurt?
Re: How could CoOp have prevented? - Posted by blogger
Posted by blogger on July 28, 2006 at 20:13:24:
You didn’t say “again” the first post here.
Sure, if the co-op did know they had a dangerous “pusher” on their premises, one with a bad propensity to go around “pushing” people on the shoulder (shudder!) it could have reached the pushing point so they might have had some responsibility to warn that culprit pusher and warned the innocent that they might be “pushee” victims if they weren’t careful.
Hope they’ve finally caught and stopped that bad pusher.