Some more info! YIKES! - Posted by Jim FL
Posted by Jim FL on July 21, 2001 at 24:26:11:
Stacy,
I was involved in the conversation where Sandy’s friend mentioned the loan being called.
Many of us who are avid “Getters of the deed” asked the very same things being asked here.
This is the situation as we were told;
Buyer purchased the home “Subject to”, using the land trust method.
Has had the home for a year or so, and things are current.
The seller apparently called the lender asking if the loan was still in their name. (Violation of the agreement with the buyer?)
The buyer/investor called the alleged “Bluff” by Countrywide, and they said, “too bad, so sad, we are going to foreclose, and FAST!” The notice of acceleration came in the form of a letter requesting FULL payoff within a short time, like a month. (YIKES!!)
So, the buyer/investor, who now has a tenant/buyer in the home is faced with either having to refi it, or pay it off somehow, since the tenant/buyer in the home cannot get a loan yet.
The tenant/buyer was told about the underlying financing, and the fact that it “May” be called due.
But, the buyer/investor wants to save face with the tenant/buyer,and keep them in the home.
When asked “what?” they were going to do about this, they answered; “Write a check”.
So, apparently the loan is being called because the original seller contacted the mortgage lender company and “Tipped them off”.
Since this was the case, the scenario did not really bother me too much, but hearing now that it is happening to someone else makes me want to look into it more.
I wonder if there were similair circumstances with this one mentioned here?
We shall see.
I am concerned, since I have done some with Countrywide as the lender.
This is the MAIN reason I TRY to MAKE IT CLEAR to sellers, “DO NOT contact the lender and tell them you sold the home, leaving the loan in place!”
And if they do, what would be the recourse anyway?
They have nothing I could go after for violating the agreement. Since most were in bad financial situations to begin with. (the reason they sold to me this way in the first place.)
I’ll be keeping a keen eye on this issue, that is for sure.
What IS Countrywide thinking anyway?
Especially since many of their loans are handled with servicing companies. At least the few I’ve dealt with were. Doesn’t this kind of keep them removed from them?
Could be interesting, and may require us to not deal with homes which have loans from them.
Which is too bad, there seem to be plenty out there.
Then again, this could be an opening for things to change for the better?
Who knows?
If anyone else “Hears” or reads anything on this, PLEASE pass it along.
Take care,
Jim FL