Posted by Jim on March 09, 2004 at 06:58:00:
Since there is no wage to garnish, and no bank account to attach and the property is not in her name I guess we can let it ride. So far, one year later no action of any kind has been attempted by the judgement holder. Thanks for your reply and by the way we have learned a lot from the material we have purchased from you in the past.
Judgements - Posted by Jim
Posted by Jim on March 08, 2004 at 12:51:57:
Question my wife was counter sued after she filed a second cause, after representation by a less than adequate attorney and a prejudiced judge she ended up with a $1,800.00 judgement against her. The judgement was against her, her name only, no property or anything else. Since then nothing has been done. The opposition utilized a legal aid attorney and the way I undersatnd it he is paid for the case and has nothing to do with collecting the judgement. So the question is since she has nothing in her name can any properties be attached? This happened in Ohio.
Re: Judgments - Posted by William Bronchick
Posted by William Bronchick on March 08, 2004 at 20:38:41:
If the judgment holder desires, he can execute bank accounts, garnish wages and seize all non-exempt property. The judgment may be good for as long as 10 years, depending on your local law.