Re: Flat fee MLS listing services? - Posted by Mike (TN)
Posted by Mike (TN) on December 15, 2006 at 07:55:29:
“What is a bunch of BS is you believe a person should not have a say so in what amount they are willing to work for.”
Huh?
I wasn’t suggesting that real estate agents do not work hard, nor was I suggesting that they should not get paid for what they do. Re-read the post before grinding your axe, as my axe related to the ILLEGAL practice of acting as a group to squelch competition. It is essentially the same law which governs price fixing, another area where real estate agents are treading on thin ice.
If a person does not want to pay a listing agent, he should have that right without being forced to “play ball” with the realtor cabal. Under all the flat fee arrangements I’ve seen, the selling agent still gets paid, usually 2.5-3%, which is exactly what they typically get if they are the selling agent and a real estate agent at another firm is the listing agent. Under that scenario, if a real estate shows property that is listed by any other firm that lists the same commission to them but refuses to show properties listed by flat fee payers, they are acting in an anticompetitive fashion. The real estate agent gets the same commission either way, so should he care? He cares because he is scared sh!tless that he won’t be able to get the much easier money that comes from being the listing agent if everyone starting using flat fee agents to do the listing.
Consumers should not have to be forced to “play ball” if they do not want to. They should not have to buy services that they neither need nor desire. If I want to do my own advertising and have the flexibility to sell it on my own (while having the option to allow a real estate agent to show it and being legally bound to pay them a commission for what they bring to the table), I should be able to do so.