Posted by JHyre in Ohio on October 14, 2001 at 06:20:30:
on the nature of the L/O’s invoved and how they are structured. If the eventual result is that you get really good tenants but few truly end up exercising L/O, I’d go with LLC because you are in effect “holding”. If on the other hand, alot of people will repair their credit and get the financing to actually exercise their options, I’d go with corp, because you are acting like a “dealer”.
Not one vs. the other, but IN ADDITION TO. The trust is simply a title holding device. The beneficiary of the trust can be a limited partnership or LLC.
Posted by Andre(NC) on October 12, 2001 at 10:29:12:
I have an S corp b/c my plan is to do sandwich lease options. So I guess you’re saying it would be more beneficial if taking properties “subject to” via the trust to use an LLC? Guess I better read through your land trust course again.
Posted by Bronchick on October 12, 2001 at 11:05:46:
No, use the land trust. Whether the LLC or S corp is the beneficiary of the trust is a tax issue, depending on whether the property is short or long term.
Posted by Andre(NC) on October 12, 2001 at 15:03:50:
Think I got it, but one more question. If I remember correctly from an article you wrote, LLC is for long term and S corp is for short term. How would you define long term in years?